Functional Categorization of Gene Products (GO Graphical)

Categorizing BLAST results of putative or prospective proteins allows different libraries to be compared in terms of their expressional profile as a starting point for understanding high throughput data. The approach should be viewed cautiously as BLAST results may provide misleading data. Biochemical confirmation is still widely accepted as a necessary component of any study of a specific gene that is initially characterized by BLAST. Also, there are many different ways of categorizing genes. Three leading methods are (1) COG, (2) GO (Gene Ontogeny), and MiPS. The two former ones are used on this site, but there is no consensus that a specific approach is the best. Each is supported by significant research programs and provides different classifications that may prove advantageous under distinct conditions.


Below are summary charts of functional group differences for the obtained EST libraries obtained using the GO site for categorization of functional classes. These are preliminary classifications based on semi-automatic categorization.

Sperm Sua (top) versus Sperm Svn (below)

Sua chart
Svn chart

Legend to Categories

Click the following link to display the legend on a different page.


A complete listing of the Gene Ontology (GO) treatment of all contigs and singletons is available for the: [Sua] [Svn] [combined page (takes twice as long to load)]


Here are some further resources:


This file was last modified on Friday, 21-Nov-2003 00:29:29 UTC